Comments on: Functional programming, APL and Unix pipes http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:16:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Daniil http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes/comment-page-1#comment-169617 Daniil Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:39:12 +0000 http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes#comment-169617 Hey, nice post, but I would like to bring your attention to the fact that "~>" is not really a pipe operator. You see, what you do is basically this: file ~> sort ~> uniq -c ~> sort -n Which is not cool. If you want to be more pipish, you gotta do (sort file) ~> urniq -c ~> sort -n, which is not really cool too. Do you know, is there a way to make actual pipes in haskell? PS: Sorry for my English, I am not a native speaker. Hey, nice post, but I would like to bring your attention to the fact that “~>” is not really a pipe operator. You see, what you do is basically this:
file ~> sort ~> uniq -c ~> sort -n
Which is not cool. If you want to be more pipish, you gotta do

(sort file) ~> urniq -c ~> sort -n, which is not really cool too.

Do you know, is there a way to make actual pipes in haskell?

PS: Sorry for my English, I am not a native speaker.

]]> By: Porges http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes/comment-page-1#comment-10125 Porges Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:52:45 +0000 http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes#comment-10125 Strangely enough, that was what I used when I first posted this. I edited it a little later to change "|>" to "~>" because I thought it looked nicer :) Strangely enough, that was what I used when I first posted this. I edited it a little later to change “|>” to “~>” because I thought it looked nicer

]]> By: falcon http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes/comment-page-1#comment-10103 falcon Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:14:06 +0000 http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes#comment-10103 Check out F#'s |> function :) Check out F#’s |> function

]]> By: Porges http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes/comment-page-1#comment-10063 Porges Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:31:54 +0000 http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes#comment-10063 I was going to explore the monad -> pipe relation in more detail myself but I had yet to get the connections straight in my head :) Thanks for the links! I was going to explore the monad -> pipe relation in more detail myself but I had yet to get the connections straight in my head Thanks for the links!

]]> By: Gwern http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes/comment-page-1#comment-10056 Gwern Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:59:39 +0000 http://porg.es/blog/functional-programming-apl-and-unix-pipes#comment-10056 You're not the first to think these sort of things. You'd probably find http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/monadic-shell.html and http://software.complete.org/hsh to be of interest. You’re not the first to think these sort of things. You’d probably find http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/monadic-shell.html and http://software.complete.org/hsh to be of interest.

]]>