The aftershock that wasn’t

commentary 26 December 2007 | 0 Comments

From the Herald’s ‘Civil defence not worried by Gisborne aftershock’: GNS Science said it was not classed as an aftershock So why was the word ‘aftershock’ in the title? This seems to be the latest in a series of articles in the Herald attempting to capitalize on the aftermath of the Gisborne earthquake. The Richter-scale [...]

Tagged in , , , , ,